The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1036•United States v. Jermaine Harris
02-1036Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2002
1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-1869
___________
Willie J. Brown, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Mid-America Packaging/Gaylord *
Container, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 4, 2002
Filed: October 25, 2002
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit
Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Willie J. Brown appeals the district court’s1 entry of judgment on a jury verdict
in his action against his former employer Mid-America Packaging/Gaylord Container
(Gaylord) under the Family and Medical Leave Act. We decline to review the
arguments Brown raises on appeal, because they are based on theories he did not
pursue at trial. See Baas v. Hoye, 766 F.2d 1190, 1194 (8th Cir. 1985) (where
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
plaintiff submits no jury instructions on issues allegedly raised by pleadings and fails
to except to failure of district court to so charge, these issues cannot be considered on
appeal; this court must determine what theories of recovery were actually submitted
to jury).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.