The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2038•Schaller Telephone v. Golden Sky Systems
01-2038Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2002
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-1485
___________
Phelix Henry Frazier; Phelix T. *
Frazier; Darren Thomas, *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
Joe Robinson, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeals from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
David Turner, Special Agent, Drug * District of Missouri.
Enforcement Administration, in his * [UNPUBLISHED]
individual capacity, *
*
Appellee, *
*
Unknown, named federal employees of *
the USA, *
*
Defendant, *
*
David Turner, Special Agent, Drug *
Enforcement Administration, in his *
official capacity, *
*
Appellee. *
-- 1 of 3 --
-2-
___________
No. 02-1488
___________
Phelix Henry Frazier, *
*
Appellant, *
*
Phelix T. Frazier; Darren Thomas; Joe *
Robinson, *
*
Plaintiffs, *
*
v. *
*
David Turner, Special Agent, Drug *
Enforcement Administration, in his *
individual capacity, *
*
Appellee, *
*
Unknown, named federal employees of *
the USA, *
*
Defendant, *
*
David Turner, Special Agent, Drug *
Enforcement Administration, in his *
official capacity, *
*
Appellee. *
-- 2 of 3 --
1 The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-3-
___________
Submitted: July 2, 2002
Filed: July 8, 2002
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Joe Robinson and Phelix Henry Frazier appeal the district court’s1 adverse
grant of summary judgment in their action against Special Agent David Turner of the
Drug Enforcement Administration. Having carefully reviewed the record and the
parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the conclusions reached by the district
court, and we therefore affirm. We also find without merit appellants’ arguments
regarding the court’s failure to serve Turner in his individual capacity and the court’s
enlargement of Turner’s time to file an answer to appellants’ amended complaint.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.