The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1823•United States v. Robert L. Shepherd
01-1823United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitMar 29, 2002
1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-3927
___________
Allen Ray Bishop, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Arkansas.
Donnie Threet, Deputy; *
Bob Ross, Sheriff, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 27, 2002
Filed: March 4, 2002
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Allen Ray Bishop, a former inmate at the Crawford County Detention Center
in Van Buren, Arkansas, appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference. Upon
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
de novo review of the record, we conclude that summary judgment was proper. See
Larson v. City of Fergus Falls, 229 F.3d 692, 696 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of
review); Keeper v. King, 130 F.3d 1309, 1314 (8th Cir.1997) (to prove deliberate
indifference, plaintiff had to show defendants knew of, yet disregarded, excessive risk
to his health); Sanders v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 984 F.2d 972, 975 (8th Cir. 1993)
(respondeat-superior-based claim “is not cognizable under § 1983”). Further, the
district court did not commit a gross abuse of discretion affecting the fundamental
fairness of the proceedings by refusing to compel discovery. See Stuart v. Gen.
Motors Corp., 217 F.3d 621, 630 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.