The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1823•United States v. Robert L. Shepherd
01-1823United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitMar 29, 2002
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-3723
___________
Gary Barfield, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
* Appeal from the United States
Dr. Duong Ly, East Arkansas * District Court for the Eastern
Regional Unit, ADC; Bernard * District of Arkansas.
Williams, Infirmary Manager, East *
Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Max * [UNPUBLISHED]
Mobley, Deputy Director of Health *
Services, Arkansas Department of *
Correction, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: March 6, 2002
Filed: March 8, 2002
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gary Barfield challenges the district court's dismissal of Barfield's 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 lawsuit after holding a pretrial evidentiary hearing. After careful
consideration of all the evidence, the district court concluded there was no evidence
from which a jury could find the correctional officials acted with deliberate
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
indifference to Barfield's serious medical needs. Based on our de novo review, see
Randle v. Parker, 48 F.3d 301, 303 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review), we agree
with the district court and thus affirm the order of dismissal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.