Jose Antonio Caban v. United States

1 The Honorable Kathleen A. Jaudzemis, United States Magistrate Judge for the
District of Nebraska, presiding with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(c).
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1996
___________
Suzanne Schmidt, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Nebraska.
*
Dayton Hudson, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 11, 2002
Filed: February 21, 2002
___________
Before BOWMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Suzanne Schmidt brought a Title VII case against Dayton Hudson, Inc.,
asserting claims of hostile work environment, retaliation, and constructive discharge.
The District Court 1 granted summary judgment in favor of Dayton Hudson. Schmidt
appeals, arguing that the evidence in the summary-judgment record shows various
disputed issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
Having reviewed the record de novo in light of the briefs and oral arguments
and applying well-established summary-judgment standards, we are satisfied the
District Court correctly ruled that Dayton Hudson was entitled to summary judgment.
We conclude that as a matter of law Schmidt has failed to make a case for trial on any
of her claims. Finding no flaw in the District Court's thorough and well-reasoned
memorandum and order, we affirm the final judgment entered by that court against
Schmidt and in favor of Dayton Hudson. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-- 2 of 2 --