The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1451•Jose Antonio Caban v. United States
01-1451Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2002
1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John M.
Mason, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1549
___________
Richard C. Eline, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
C. Walter; M. Arnot; K. Ehrenberg, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 4, 2002
Filed: February 7, 2002
___________
Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Inmate Richard Eline appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice
of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see Booth v. Churner, 121 S. Ct.
1819, 1825 (2001) (42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) mandates exhaustion regardless of relief
offered through administrative procedures); and we reject his arguments on appeal
as either meritless or procedurally improper, see Mahaney v. Warren County, 206
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
F.3d 770, 771 n.2 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (this court generally does not consider
issues raised for first time in reply brief).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.