The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-3213•United States v. Melayne R. Danekas
01-3213United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitJan 31, 2002
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-3496
___________
Charter Communications, Inc., *
a corporation, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Missouri.
*
Southwestern Bell Telephone * [UNPUBLISHED]
Company, a corporation, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 17, 2002
Filed: January 24, 2002
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWB) appeals from the grant of
Charter Communications, Inc.'s request for a preliminary injunction against certain
advertising of SWB claimed to be in violation of the Lanham Act and state law.
Having considered the record and the parties' arguments, we are satisfied the district
-- 1 of 2 --
*
The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-
court * correctly granted the requested injunction pending trial on the merits. Because
the parties' submissions show they are thoroughly familiar with the issues before the
court, we believe an extensive discussion is not warranted. Having reviewed SWB's
contentions of reversible error and abuse of discretion, we affirm for the reasons
explained in the district court's thorough opinion and remand to the district court for
further proceedings.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.