The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-3213•United States v. Melayne R. Danekas
01-3213Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2002
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-2332
___________
Clyde Johnson, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Davis Henry Loftin, Attorney at Law; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Public Defenders Office, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: September 26, 2001
Filed: January 2, 2002
___________
Before McMILLIAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Clyde Johnson appeals from the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal
of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Cooper
v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review), we agree
with the district court that dismissal was warranted. See City of Canton v. Harris, 489
U.S. 378, 385 (1989); Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981).
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R.
47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.