The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2089•United States v. Gregory D. White
00-2089Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 30, 2001
1 The Honorable Norman H. Stahl, United States Circuit Judge for the First
Circuit, sitting by designation.
2 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1441
___________
Eddie David Cox, *
*
Appellant *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
United States of America, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
*
___________
Submitted: November 13, 2001
Filed: November 26, 2001
___________
Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and STAHL, 1 Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Eddie David Cox appeals the District Court's2 decision denying his request,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), to correct or amplify a 1982 ruling granting the
appellant’s motion to vacate a conviction for drug trafficking. Petitioner maintains
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
that the District Court abused its discretion by summarily denying his request that the
court explain the basis for its 1982 ruling, without holding a hearing or appointing
counsel. However, Appellant's eighteen year delay in filing this motion far exceeds
the “reasonable time frame” established by Rule 60(b). Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the District Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
ATTEST:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.