The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1375•Steven McCoy v. USA
1The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge
for the Eastern District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-3830
___________
Harry James Sutton, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
U.S. Probation Office; Timothy M. *
Scharr, U.S. Probation Officer; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Kathleen M. Hawk, Director of Bureau, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 26, 2001
Filed: August 1, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Harry James Sutton appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
dismissal of his action under the Privacy Act, in which he alleged that his presentence
report contained “inaccurate” information. This appeal is frivolous, and therefore we
dismiss it. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.