The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1375•Steven McCoy v. USA
*The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-3353
___________
Gloria D. Smith, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Larry G. Massanari, Acting *
Commissioner, Social Security * [UNPUBLISHED]
Administration, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 7, 2001
Filed: August 15, 2001
___________
Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gloria D. Smith appeals the district court's* grant of summary judgment in favor
of the Social Security Commissioner, affirming the denial of Smith's March 1997
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
application for disability insurance benefits after a hearing before an administrative law
judge (ALJ), and after the Appeals Council denied review. Having reviewed the
record, we find the Commissioner's final decision is supported by substantial evidence
on the record as a whole, including consideration of the new evidence submitted to the
Appeals Council, to the extent the evidence related to the period before the ALJ's
decision. See Cunningham v. Apfel, 222 F.3d 496, 500 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of
review). In particular, the ALJ considered Smith's impairments in combination,
permissibly discounted one treating physician's opinion and gave another treating
physician's opinion controlling weight, made sufficient credibility findings, made a
supported finding of no severe mental impairment, and did not fail to follow applicable
regulations.
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.