The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1757•Patrice Greer v. St. Louis Regional
00-1757United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitJul 31, 2001
1The HONORABLE JOHN R. TUNHEIM, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the HONORABLE
FRANKLIN L. NOEL, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1192
___________
Chidi N. Anunka, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Minnesota.
*
Joan Campbell; Minneapolis City * [UNPUBLISHED]
Council, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: June 28, 2001
Filed: July 5, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Chidi N. Anunka appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. §
1983 action as time-barred. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’
briefs, we agree that the complaint was filed after the expiration of the applicable six-
year limitations period, see Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989); Berg v.
Groschen, 437 N.W.2d 75, 77 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989), and that the circumstances did
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
not justify equitable tolling, see Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 269 (1985); Ochs v.
Streater, Inc., 568 N.W.2d 858, 860 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.