The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1822•Linda Mays v. H.G. Rhodes
00-1822United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitJun 29, 2001
1The HONORABLE GEORGE HOWARD, JR., United States District Judge for
the Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-3773
___________
Betty J. Vernon, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
North Point Ford; Ford Motor Credit, *
(1); Tri-Ford Mercury; Ford Motor * [UNPUBLISHED]
Company; Ford Motor Credit, (2), *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: June 7, 2001
Filed: June 12, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Betty J. Vernon appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se action
alleging state and federal law violations related to her purchase of an automobile and
to a subsequent state court action. After de novo review of the record, see Charchenko
v. City of Stillwater, 47 F.3d 981, 982 (8th Cir. 1995); Springdale Educ. Ass&n v.
Springdale Sch. Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir. 1998), we conclude dismissal was
-- 1 of 2 --
2
proper for the reasons stated by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Vernon&s pending motions are
denied.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.