The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1822•Linda Mays v. H.G. Rhodes
00-1822United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitJun 29, 2001
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 00-2953EA
_____________
Jerry L. Jarrett, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas *
Department of Correction; Max *
Mobley, Director of Treatment, *
Arkansas Department of Correction; *
John Byus, Director of Medical * On Appeal from the United
Treatment, Arkansas Department of * States District Court
Correction (originally sued as Byse); * for the Eastern District
Correctional Medical Services * of Arkansas.
(originally sued as C.M.S.); Michael *
Young, Dr., Assistant Director * [Not To Be Published]
Diagnostic Medicine, Arkansas *
Department of Correction; Brickman, *
Medical Director, Diagnostic Unit, *
Arkansas Department of Correction; *
Mogho, Dr., Medical Assistant *
Director, Diagnostic Unit, Arkansas *
Department of Correction; Charlie *
Walls, Medical Supervisor, Sebastian *
County Sheriff’s Office, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: June 7, 2001
Filed: June 25, 2001
___________
-- 1 of 2 --
1The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
-2-
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Jerry Jarrett appeals the District Court’s1 dismissal without
prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative
remedies as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 2000). The District
Court did not err. Although Jarrett submitted numerous grievances regarding his
medical care, he did not present proof that he fully exhausted as to all of the claims in
his complaint. See Graves v. Norris, 218 F.3d 884, 885 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam);
McAlphin v. Morgan, 216 F.3d 680, 682 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam); Hartsfield v.
Vidor, 199 F.3d 305, 309 (6th Cir. 1999).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.