The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1822•Linda Mays v. H.G. Rhodes
00-1822United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitJun 29, 2001
1The Hon. Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
Western District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 00-2723WM
_____________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * On Appeal from the United
* States District Court
v. * for the Western District
* of Missouri.
*
Daniel J. Whitt, * [Not To Be Published]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: May 24, 2001
Filed: June 5, 2001
___________
Before LOKEN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
After a hearing, the District Court1 found that Daniel J. Whitt had violated the
conditions of his supervised release, revoked it, and sentenced him to six months
imprisonment and one year supervised release. Whitt appeals.
We have reviewed the district court record and appellant's brief. Finding no
error, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. When the District Court imposed
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
sentence on revocation of supervised release, the punishment selected was less than the
statutory maximum, less than the three years of supervised release originally received
by the defendant, and at the lower range of the term suggested by the Guidelines,
U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(a). Violations that Whitt admitted (testing positive for marijuana),
standing alone, were sufficient to support the Court's action.
Affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.