The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1379•Carl E. Brant v. Principal Life and
00-1379United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitApr 30, 2001
1The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
Western District of Missouri.
2Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971).
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1341
___________
Tarvuell Clark, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
Hugh G. Harris, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 2, 2001
Filed: April 10, 2001
___________
Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal prisoner Tarvuell Clark appeals the district court’s1 pre-service dismissal
of his Bivens2 action and moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Having
carefully reviewed the record, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000)
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
(per curiam), we conclude that Mr. Clark’s complaint failed to state an Eighth
Amendment claim upon which relief may be granted. Because Mr. Clark has paid the
appellate filing fee, we deny his IFP motion as moot.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.