The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1379•Carl E. Brant v. Principal Life and
00-1379United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitApr 30, 2001
*The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota, sitting by designation.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-3878
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Rodney L. Edgerson, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 10, 2001
Filed: April 18, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL,* District Judge.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Rodney L. Edgerson appeals his jury conviction for distribution of crack cocaine,
arguing the evidence was insufficient to convict him. Viewing the evidence in the light
most favorable to the verdict and giving the verdict the benefit of all reasonable
inferences, we conclude a reasonable jury could have found Edgerson guilty beyond
-- 1 of 2 --
**The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
-2-
a reasonable doubt on each essential element of the charge. We thus affirm Edgerson's
conviction.**
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.