Full text
1The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-3437
___________
George Frye, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
Comair, Inc., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 24, 2001
Filed: April 27, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
George Frye appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his Age Discrimination in Employment Act complaint. Upon de novo
review of the summary judgment record, and viewing the evidence in the light most
favorable to Frye, we conclude summary judgment was proper because Frye failed to
submit sufficient evidence that Comair’s stated reasons for his termination were a
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
pretext for age discrimination. See Dammen v. UniMed Med. Ctr., 236 F.3d 978, 980
(8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review; burden-shifting analysis).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
