The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1379•Carl E. Brant v. Principal Life and
00-1379United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitApr 30, 2001
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-1781
___________
Robert E. Jackson, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Larry B. Norris, Director, Arkansas *
Department of Correction; Dale Reed, *
Warden, Arkansas Department of * Appeal from the United States
Correction; A. J. Hall, Major, Chief * District Court for the Eastern
of Security, Arkansas Department of * District of Arkansas.
Correction; Savell Everett, Lieutenant, *
Arkansas Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED]
D. Harris, Captain, Arkansas *
Department of Correction; James *
Dickerson, CO-I, Arkansas *
Department of Correction; Larry D. *
White, CO-I, Arkansas Department *
of Correction; D. Woodard, Arkansas *
Department of Correction, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 6, 2001
Filed: April 18, 2001
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,
Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
___________
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Robert E. Jackson brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against
the prison officials named in his complaint for injuries Jackson suffered during an
August 1994 attack by another inmate. Concluding Jackson's action was precluded by
our decision in Jackson v. Everett, 140 F.3d 1149 (8th Cir. 1998), the district court
dismissed the complaint on res judicata grounds. Having carefully reviewed the record,
we agree with the district court's ruling. We also conclude that to the extent Jackson's
claims are not barred by the doctrine of res judicata, they are barred by Arkansas's
three-year statute of limitations. See ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-56-105 (Michie 1987);
Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 276-79 (1985); Hillary v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.,
123 F.3d 1041, 1044 n.2 (8th Cir. 1997); Courtney v. First Nat'l Bank, 780 S.W.2d
536, 537-38 (Ark. 1989). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.