The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1379•Carl E. Brant v. Principal Life and
00-1379United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th CircuitApr 30, 2001
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-1651
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Gregory Lamont Charles, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 6, 2001
Filed: April 18, 2001
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, Gregory Lamont Charles contends the district court
committed reversible error by refusing to declare a mistrial and by allowing the
government to bolster the testimony of one of its witnesses. Having satisfied ourselves
that the district court correctly resolved Charles's challenges and that the appeal simply
involves the application of settled principles of law to unique facts, we conclude the
issues do not warrant a comprehensive opinion. We thus reject Charles's contentions
and affirm his conviction without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.