The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1002•United States v. Vibanco-Sanchez
00-1002Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2001
1The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 00-1257MN
_____________
Leland W. Jacobs, *
*
Appellant, *
* On Appeal from the United
v. * States District Court
* for the District of
Gear Properties; Bonnie Gear, * Minnesota.
individually, doing business as Gear *
Properties; Alan Gear, individually, * [Not To Be Published]
doing business as Gear Properties, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: January 22, 2001
Filed: February 2, 2001
___________
Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Leland W. Jacobs appeals the District Court’s1 dismissal of his civil rights
action, in which he claimed that defendants evicted him from his apartment for a
discriminatory or retaliatory reason. Plaintiff’s eviction occurred after defendants
-- 1 of 2 --
2Gear Props. v. Jacobs, No. C1-97-2266, 1998 WL 550762 (Minn. Ct. App.
Sept. 1, 1998) (unpublished decision).
3Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Court of
Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983).
-2-
prevailed in their state court unlawful detainer action against him.2 After de novo
review, see Lemonds v. St. Louis County, 222 F.3d 488, 492 (8th Cir. 2000), we
conclude the District Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s action, as it lacked subject
matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman3 doctrine. See Charchenko v. City of
Stillwater, 47 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir. 1995) (Rooker-Feldman precludes federal claims
if relief requested would effectively reverse state court decision or void its ruling).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.