The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1477•United States v. Donald Lee Dugan
00-1477Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2001
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-2647
___________
Charles Armstrong, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
* Appeal from the United States
State of Missouri; Mel Carnahan; * District Court for the Eastern
City of Vinita Park; Virginia Bira; * District of Missouri.
Vinita Park Police Department; 911 *
Emergency System of St. Louis * (UNPUBLISHED)
County; Robert Hartz; Richard Aites; *
St. Louis County; St. Louis County *
Correctional/Justice Department Center *
and Jail Personnel; the 21st Judicial *
Circuit of Missouri, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: December 22, 2000
Filed: January 5, 2001
___________
Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit
Judges.
___________
-- 1 of 2 --
1The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-
PER CURIAM.
Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se civil
rights complaint against multiple defendants. After careful review of the record, we
conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), (e)(1); Bray v. Alexandria
Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42,
48 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.