The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1477•United States v. Donald Lee Dugan
00-1477Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2001
1The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-2582
___________
Charles Armstrong, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
Barbara DeBois, * District of Missouri.
*
Appellee. * (UNPUBLISHED)
___________
Submitted: December 22, 2000
Filed: January 5, 2001
___________
Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit
Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se civil
rights complaint against private-party defendant Barbara Debois. After careful review
of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to
state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.