The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1477•United States v. Donald Lee Dugan
00-1477Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2001
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-1951
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the District
v. * of Minnesota.
*
Sheila Jean Robinson, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 5, 2001
Filed: January 10, 2001
___________
Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Sheila Jean Robinson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court
following revocation of Robinson's supervised release. Robinson contends the district
court committed error in failing to give her advance notice of its intent to depart upward
from the 5-to-11-month revocation imprisonment range recommended under Chapter
7 of the Guidelines, to a revocation sentence of 12 months imprisonment and 2 years
supervised release. This argument is foreclosed by the holdings of this court. See
United States v. Shaw, 180 F.3d 920, 922 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (Chapter 7
Guidelines serve non-binding, advisory role; thus, revocation sentence which exceeds
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
suggested range "is not an 'upward departure' because there is no binding guideline
from which to depart").
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.