The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1190•Pansy Blackwell v. Jim Hohn
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-4205
___________
Varnice Parker, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Social Security Administration, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 22, 2000
Filed: December 26, 2000
___________
Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Varnice Parker appeals the district court's denial of Parker's Federal Rules Civil
Procedure 59(e) motion requesting the court amend its judgment in her disability
benefits case to reflect its remand was under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
While this appeal was pending, the administrative law judge (ALJ) reconsidered
Parker's claim and entered an order awarding Parker benefits back to her claimed onset
date of disability. We conclude the ALJ's decision granted Parker all the relief she
sought and thus mooted this appeal. See Burton v. Daniels, 815 F.2d 1239, 1241 (8th
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Cir. 1987) (Commissioner mooted claimants' appeal for immediate reinstatement of
their benefits by reinstating claimants' benefits while their appeal was pending; thus,
there was no "live controversy" to adjudicate).
Accordingly, we dismiss Parker's appeal as moot.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.