The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2768•John Gregory Lambros v. USA
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-1199
___________
Jack Burton Management Co., a *
Missouri Corporation, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Missouri.
*
American National Insurance Co., * [UNPUBLISHED]
a Texas corporation, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: November 16, 2000
Filed: November 22, 2000
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jack Burton Management Co. (JBM) leased property for 99 years and subleased
it to Gilroy, Sims & Associates. American National Insurance Co. acquired the
leasehold interest through foreclosure and eventually stopped paying rent. Alleging
breach of the sublease, JBM brought this diversity action seeking damages from
American National. Applying Missouri law, the district court granted partial summary
judgment to JBM on the liability issue, concluding American National stood in the
same position as an assignee of the sublease and thus was liable to JBM under privity
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
of estate. After a bench trial on damages, the district court awarded JBM $104,221.60
for past due rents and $410,972.36 for the present value of the lost future rent and tax
payments due through the rest of the sublease term. On appeal, American National
attacks the district court's conclusions that American National assumed the sublease's
obligations absent privity of contract, and that American National had privity of estate
after American National surrendered the property. American National also argues that
in deciding the amount of damages, the district court should not have used the federal
postjudgment interest rate as the discount rate. Having carefully reviewed the parties'
briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we conclude the district court committed no
error and affirm without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.