The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1276•United States v. Thomas Lee Goldman
00-1276Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 29, 2000
1The Hon. H. Franklin Waters, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 99-3177WA
_____________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * On Appeal from the United
* States District Court
v. * for the Western District
* of Arkansas.
David Pardue, *
* [Not To Be Published]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 6, 2000
Filed: September 19, 2000
___________
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
David Pardue appeals from the District Court's1 order finding him in violation of
the conditions of his supervised release, and modifying those conditions. As to the
finding of a violation, we hold that this issue is not ripe for decision. The District Court
did not revoke Mr. Pardue's supervised release, nor did it impose any punishment for
the violation it found. As to the modification of the conditions of supervised release,
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
we see no error of fact or law, especially in view of the fact that Mr. Pardue, through
counsel, agreed to the modification.
Affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.