The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6002•David E. Schroeder v. Norman E. Rouse
00-6002Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 28, 2000
1The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-3591
___________
Diana Oswald, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Southern District of Iowa.
*
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED]
Social Security Commission, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 13, 2000
Filed: April 24, 2000
___________
Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Diana L. Oswald appeals from the affirmance by the District Court1 of the
Commissioner's denial of her claim for disability benefits. The Administrative Law
Judge ("ALJ") determined that Oswald had the residual functional capacity to return
to her former work as a receptionist and thus was not disabled. Oswald challenges that
determination.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Having considered the briefs and record, we conclude that the Commissioner's
decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. We are
satisfied that the ALJ did not err in assessing Oswald's subjective complaints of pain,
in making a vocational assessment, or in rejecting the opinion of her treating physician.
Accordingly, the decision denying Oswald disability insurance benefits and
supplemental security income is AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.