The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6002•David E. Schroeder v. Norman E. Rouse
00-6002Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 28, 2000
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-3167
___________
Judith Lamb, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, *
Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 6, 2000
Filed: April 21, 2000
___________
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Judith Lamb appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment upholding
the Commissioner's decision to deny Lamb disability insurance and supplemental
security income benefits. After careful review of the administrative record and the
parties' briefs, we conclude no error of law or fact appears and an opinion would lack
precedential value. We thus affirm the district court without further discussion. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.