The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6002•David E. Schroeder v. Norman E. Rouse
00-6002Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 28, 2000
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2136
___________
Moosbrugger, Dvorak & Carter, *
P.L.L.P., *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the District
v. * of North Dakota.
*
Froelich-Paulson-Moore, Inc.; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Auto-Owners Insurance Company, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 24, 2000
Filed: April 26, 2000
___________
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Moosbrugger, Dvorak & Carter, P.L.L.P. (MDC) appeals the district court's
grant of summary judgment in favor of Froelich-Paulson-Moore, Inc. and Auto-Owners
Insurance Company (collectively the appellees), in MDC's suit for additional coverage
under a standard flood insurance policy issued under the National Flood Insurance Act,
42 U.S.C. §§ 4001-4129. After review of the records and the parties' briefs, we agree
with the district court that the appellees were entitled to summary judgment for the
reasons expressed in the court's order.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.