The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6002•David E. Schroeder v. Norman E. Rouse
00-6002Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 28, 2000
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2035
___________
Kenneth E. Risinger, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED]
Social Security Administration, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 3, 2000
Filed: April 4, 2000
___________
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this action seeking review of the Social Security Commissioner's final decision
to deny Kenneth E. Risinger's applications for benefits, Risinger filed his notice of
appeal more than sixty days after the district court entered judgment in favor of the
Commissioner. We therefore lack jurisdiction over Risinger's appeal. See Fed. R.
App. P.4(a)(1)(B); 26; Burgs v. Johnson County, Iowa, 79 F.3d 701, 702 (8th Cir.
1996) (per curiam) (timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
-- 1 of 2 --
2–
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.