The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-3987•Bruce Hazen v. Michael Reagen
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-3703
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Jerry White, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: February 15, 2000
Filed: March 14, 2000
___________
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HEANEY and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jerry White appeals his convictions in the district court for possessing cocaine
in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a) and illegally possessing a firearm in violation of 18
U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). He also appeals his sentence for the firearm
conviction. We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and
conclude the district court did not err in sentencing White. We are also satisfied that
the evidence presented at trialSviewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s
verdictSwas sufficient to convince a reasonable jury of White’s guilt beyond a
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
reasonable doubt. See United States v. Bascope-Zurita, 68 F.3d 1057, 1060 (8th Cir.
1996) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.