The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-3987•Bruce Hazen v. Michael Reagen
1The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 99-3640EM
_____________
John Gordon; Marie Grace Gordon, *
*
Appellants, * On Appeal from the United
* States District Court
v. * for the Eastern District
* of Missouri.
Kemper National Insurance Companies; *
American Motorist Company, * [Not To Be Published]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: March 3, 2000
Filed: March 13, 2000
___________
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
John and Marie Gordon appeal from the District Court&s1 order dismissing their
diversity action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After careful review of the
record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that the District Court properly
dismissed the case since the maximum amount the Gordons could receive in this action,
even assuming a meritorious claim, was less than the requisite jurisdictional amount.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
See St. Paul Mercury Indem. Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 289 (1938) (district
court will dismiss diversity action for lack of jurisdiction when it appears to “legal
certainty” that plaintiff cannot satisfy jurisdictional amount).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.