The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-3987•Bruce Hazen v. Michael Reagen
*The Honorable John F. Nangle, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri, sitting by designation.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2637
___________
Byron L. Coleman, *
*
Plaintiff-Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Swift Independent Packing Company; *
Swift & Company, formerly known as * Appeal from the United States
Monfort, Inc.; Con-Agra, doing * District Court for the Southern
business as Swift & Company; Monfort * District of Iowa.
Pork, filed as Monfort Pork, Monfort, *
Swift and Company; * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Defendants-Appellees, *
*
Mike Weber; Tony Harris; Vern *
Cosselman; Dave Feeback, *
*
Defendants. *
___________
Submitted: March 17, 2000
Filed: March 23, 2000
___________
Before HANSEN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and NANGLE,* District Judge.
___________
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
PER CURIAM.
Byron L. Coleman appeals an adverse grant of summary judgment in Coleman's
state law-based employment action. Coleman contends that ConAgra, Inc. and its
wholly owned subsidiary Swift & Company wrongfully terminated his employment and
fraudulently misrepresented the basis for his termination. After de novo review, we are
satisfied the magistrate judge correctly applied state law, and the record supports the
magistrate judge's ruling. Because a comprehensive opinion in this meritless diversity
case would lack precedential value, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate
judge's well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.