The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-3987•Bruce Hazen v. Michael Reagen
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2179
___________
Wilson Bourjolly, M.D., *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Missouri.
Marvin I. Koenig, M.D.; John P. *
Goltschman, M.D., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellants. *
___________
Submitted: March 15, 2000
Filed: March 22, 2000
___________
Before HANSEN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Marvin I. Koenig and John P. Goltschman, administrators of an employee
welfare benefit plan, appeal from an adverse judgment in Wilson Bourjolly's action for
damages brought under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. The record
is clear that Bourjolly requested his account balance be rolled over to another plan and
the administrators' delay in distributing the money caused Bourjolly damage. Contrary
to the administrators' views, the district court concluded the administrators breached
their fiduciary duties and granted judgment to Bourjolly. Having considered the record
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
and the parties' submissions in the context of the administrators' contentions, we agree
with the district court's analysis and conclude no error of law or fact appears in the
district court's ruling. We thus affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's ruling
without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.