The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-1388•Anthony Kingsberry v. USA
1The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 98-4268
___________
Charles Armstrong, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Missouri.
Walgreens, Inc.; Walgreens Health *
Plus, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: January 6, 2000
Filed: January 18, 2000
___________
Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se
complaint against Walgreens, Inc. and Walgreens Health Plus, Inc. under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We conclude Mr. Armstrong’s appeal is untimely because his notice
of appeal was not filed within thirty days of the dismissal order. See Fed. R. App. P.
4(a)(1)(A) (notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of judgment or
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
order being appealed); Campbell v. White, 721 F.2d 644, 645 (8th Cir. 1983) (notice
of appeal received 32 days after judgment’s entry was untimely and could not be
considered as motion for extension of time under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.