The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-1388•Anthony Kingsberry v. USA
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
__________
No. 99-2713
__________
United States of America, *
*
Plaintiff - Appellee, *
*
v. *
*
Charles Gibbon, *
*
*
Defendant - Appellant. *
Appeal from the United States
District Court for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
[UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: January 12, 2000
Filed: January 25, 2000
___________
Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD and
MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
__________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Gibbon was convicted by a jury of possession of cocaine base with
intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On appeal he argues that there
was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. After carefully reviewing the
record, we are satisfied that a rational jury could have found the essential elements of
the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. See U.S. v. Liebo, 923 F.2d 1308, 1311 (8th
-- 1 of 2 --
1The Honorable Elsijane T. Roy, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
2
Cir. 1991). We affirm the judgment of the district court1 without further discussion.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.