The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-1388•Anthony Kingsberry v. USA
1The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2510
___________
American Cyanamid Company, *
a Corporation, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Missouri.
*
St. Louis University, a Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 28, 1999
Filed: January 14, 2000
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
American Cyanamid Company appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant
of summary judgment in its declaratory judgment action seeking to determine whether
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.060 (1994) bars an action for contribution against Cyanamid by
Saint Louis University. After de novo review, see Brown v. Home Ins. Co., 176 F.3d
1102, 1105 (8th Cir. 1999), we conclude the district court’s judgment was proper for
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
the reasons stated in its thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.