The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-1388•Anthony Kingsberry v. USA
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2301
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Southern
v. * District of Iowa.
*
Gerald Porter, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 11, 2000
Filed: January 20, 2000
___________
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gerald Porter appeals his drug-related convictions and sentence. Porter contends
the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdicts. We disagree. The record
contains substantial evidence on which the jury reasonably could have found Porter
guilty of the charges. We also reject Porter's argument about his sentence. Because
Porter was properly sentenced as a career offender, an enhancement for obstruction of
justice could not and was not added to Porter's offense level. We thus affirm Porter's
convictions and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.