The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-1388•Anthony Kingsberry v. USA
1The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-1823
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Jett Lanoha, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 4, 2000
Filed: January 11, 2000
___________
Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jett Lanoha appeals from the district court’s1 order revoking his supervised
release and imposing a sentence of 18 months imprisonment and 42 months supervised
release. He argues the district court erred in imposing this revocation sentence because
the combined terms exceed the expiration of his original term of supervised release by
23 months. We conclude his argument is meritless, as the combination of the new
terms of imprisonment and supervised release (i.e., 60 months) did not exceed his
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
original 5-year term of supervised release. See United States v. St. John, 92 F.3d 761,
766 (8th Cir. 1996); United States v. Krabbenhoft, 998 F.2d 591, 594 (8th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.