The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-3519•12-1016, and 12-1290 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Christopher Blitch
11-3519Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitJan 27, 2015
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
January 27, 2015
Before
WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge*
Nos. 11‐3519, 11‐3627, 12‐1016, and 12‐1290
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff‐Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER BLITCH, et al.,
Defendants‐Appellants.
Appeals from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division.
No. 06‐CR‐586
Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge.
O R D E R
No judge of the court having called for a vote on the Petition For Rehearing or
Rehearing En Banc filed by Defendants‐Appellants on January 13, 2015, and all of the
judges on the original panel having voted to deny the same,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition For Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc
is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on
December 2, 2014, is hereby amended as follows:
* Of the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
Appeal nos. 11‐3519, 11‐3627, 12‐1016, and 12‐1290 Page 2
On page 12, the first sentence of the first full paragraph
starting “Mayfield also observed that predisposition is more
amenable …” is deleted. The remainder of that paragraph is
moved up and included with the preceding paragraph.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.