United States of America v. Gary Debenedetto

13-3281Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitApr 4, 2014

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
April 4, 2014
Before
JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge
KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge
No. 13-3281
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GARY DEBENEDETTO,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division.
No. 1:12-cr-00199
Rubén Castillo,
Chief Judge.
O R D E R
The Government has filed a Petition for Panel Rehearing requesting that we amend
our opinion of March 3, 2014, to reflect that the Government never was ordered to respond
to Mr. Debenedetto’s motion to stay. It also requests that we designate our March 3
opinion as nonprecedential. The Government explains that it did not have an opportunity
to address fully the issue of whether, in assessing the importance of the Government’s
interests under the first prong of the analysis under Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003),
the district court should focus on the maximum sentence or the probable Guidelines
sentence. This issue, however, has been fully briefed in United States v. Breedlove, No. 13-
3406, scheduled for oral argument later this month.
The panel has reexamined its March 3 opinion, and now withdraws that opinion and
substitutes the attached revised opinion. Accordingly,

-- 1 of 2 --

No.13-3281 Page 2
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion entered in this case on March 3, 2014,
be and is hereby WITHDRAWN, and that the attached revised opinion of this date be
SUBSTITUTED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.