The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1322•United States of America v. Sedgwick Johnson
03-1322Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitOct 25, 2013
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
October 25, 2013
Before
RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge
No. 03‐1322
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff‐Appellee,
v.
SEDGWICK JOHNSON,
Defendant‐Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division.
No. 01 CR 543‐3
James F. Holderman,
Judge.
ORDER
We issued a limited remand in this case to inquire whether the district court would
impose the same 360‐month sentence on Sedgwick Johnson if it knew the full extent of its
discretion. After considering both parties’ positions, the district court has responded that
it would reimpose the same sentence. Accordingly, there was no plain error in Johnson’s
sentence, see United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2005), and the judgment
of the district court is A FFIRMED.
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.