Bernard Hawkins v. United States of America

11-1245Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitJul 31, 2013

Full text

Circuit Judge Flaum took no part in the consideration å
or decision of this case.
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
No. 11-1245
BERNARD HAWKINS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.
No. 2:10-cv-00016-JTM—James T. Moody, Judge.
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.
DECIDED JULY 31, 2013
Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER,
KANNE, ROVNER, WOOD, WILLIAMS, SYKES, TINDER, and
HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.å
POSNER, Circuit Judge. The petition to rehear this case
(decided February 7, 2013, in an opinion reported at

-- 1 of 2 --

2 No. 11-1245
706 F.3d 820) en banc is denied. Judges Rovner, Wood,
Williams, and Hamilton voted to grant rehearing en banc.
See also the supplemental panel opinion, issued today,
which denies panel rehearing, together with a dissenting
opinion by Judge Rovner.
ROVNER, Circuit Judge, with whom WOOD, WILLIAMS,
and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from the
denial of rehearing en banc. I dissent from the denial of
rehearing en banc for the same reasons set forth in
my dissent from the denial of rehearing by the panel.
I hereby incorporate by reference that dissent as a state-
ment of the reasons why I believe the court should
rehear this case en banc.
7-31-13

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.