The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-2820•Kevin Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp .
08-2820Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitMay 26, 2011
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 26, 2011
Before
WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge
FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge*
No. 08‐2820
KEVIN KASTEN,
Plaintiff‐Appellant,
v.
SAINT‐G OBAIN P ERFORMANCE P LASTICS C ORP .,
Defendant‐Appellee.
___________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Wisconsin.
No. 07‐C‐0686—Barbara B. Crabb, Judge.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
No. 09‐834
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
* The Honorable Frederick J. Kapala, of the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 10‐2820 Page 2
___________________________
ORDER
On March 22, 2011, the Supreme Court reversed our decision in this case and
remanded the matter for proceedings in conformity with its opinion. Kasten v. Saint‐Gobain
Performance Plastics Corp., 131 S.Ct. 1325 (2011). In light of that opinion – concluding that
oral complaints fall within the scope of the phrase “filed any complaint” in 29 U.S.C. §
215(a)(3) – it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for further
proceedings pertaining to Kasten’s antiretaliation claim under the Fair Labor Standards
Act.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.