The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-2685•United States of America v. RAY LONGSTREET and MICHAEL ERVIN
07-2685Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitJan 12, 2010
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Submitted December 22, 2009
Decided January 12, 2010
Before
MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge
DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
Nos. 07-1657 & 07-2685
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RAY LONGSTREET and MICHAEL
ERVIN,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeals from the United States District
Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, Eastern Division.
No. 05 CR 471
Matthew F. Kennelly,
Judge.
O R D E R
On June 8, 2009, we ordered these cases be returned to the district court on limited remand
to query whether the district court wanted to resentence Ray Longstreet and Michael Ervin in
light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007). On
December 22, 2009, the district court communicated its desire to resentence the defendants.
Accordingly, we VACATE Ray Longstreet’s and Michael Ervin’s sentences and REMAND their
cases to the district court for resentencing.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.