The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1363•Parveen Idris v. City of Chicago, Illinois
08-1363United States Court Of Appeals For The 7th CircuitFeb 3, 2009
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
February 3, 2009
Before
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge
KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
No. 08-1363
PARVEEN IDRIS, et al. ,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United
States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division.
No. 06 C 6085
Robert W. Gettleman, Judge.
Order
The opinion issued on January 5, 2009, is amended as follows:
1. The sentence at slip op. 2, lines 9-10, which originally read “The district court
held otherwise and entered summary judgment for the defendants.”, is changed to:
“The district court held otherwise and dismissed the complaint.”
2. The sentence at slip op. 5 lines 19-21, which originally read “The district court
dismissed without prejudice all state-law claims, so that plaintiffs may pursue them in
state court.”, is changed to: “The district court dismissed without prejudice the claim
under state law that Chicago’s program is unauthorized or conflicts with a state statute,
so that this line of argument may be renewed in state court.”
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.