United States of America v. George Wilson

United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
May 22, 2008
Before
RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
No. 04‐2635
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff‐Appellee,
v.
GEORGE WILSON,
Defendant‐Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division.
No. 01 CR 366‐1
Ronald A. Guzman,
Judge
O R D E R
On June 27, 2007, we issued an order affirming the conviction of George Wilson.
United States v. Wilson, 240 Fed. App’x. 139 (7th Cir. 2007). But we also ordered a limited
remand pursuant to United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005), so that the district
court could tell us if the sentence Wilson received would have been different in light of
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). On March 4, 2008, the district court responded to
our order and concluded that it would have imposed the same sentence had it known that
the sentencing guidelines were advisory, rather than mandatory. On March 20, 2008, we
invited the parties, if they wished, to respond to the district court’s order. The government
responded with a statement of position on March 25, 2008. Wilson did not respond.
Having considered the matter, we conclude that Wilson received a reasonable
sentence. Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

-- 1 of 1 --