The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2523•United States of America v. Daniel Rodriguez
03-2523United States Court Of Appeals For The 7th CircuitApr 27, 2006
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
April 27, 2006
Before
Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge
Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
No. 03-2523
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeals from the United States
District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, Eastern Division
No. 01 CR 891
Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
Judge.
O R D E R
After we ordered a limited remand, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220
(205); United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2003), the district
judge informed us that he would have imposed the same sentence on Daniel
Rodriguez had he known the sentencing guidelines were advisory. Because that
sentence was within the properly calculated guidelines range, it was presumptively
reasonable. United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005).
Rodriguez filed no response to rebut that presumption and our independent review
uncovers nothing to suggest unreasonableness, therefore the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.