The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2015•Chicago, Illinois 60604 November 17, 2005 Before Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit… v. ] Illinois. ] CEDRIC WASHINGTON, ] No. 03 CR 20045
04-2015Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitNov 17, 2005
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
November 17, 2005
Before
Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge
Hon. Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge
Hon. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ] Appeal from the United
Plaintiff-Appellee, ] States District Court for
] the Central District of
No. 04-2015 v. ] Illinois.
]
CEDRIC WASHINGTON, ] No. 03 CR 20045
Defendant-Appellant. ]
] Michael P. McCuskey,
] Chief Judge.
O R D E R
On limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.
2005), the district court concluded that “it would have imposed the same sentence”
had it known that the sentencing guidelines were advisory. The parties were
offered the opportunity to respond before we finally resolved the appeal. Defendant
Washington chose not to respond while the government did requesting that we
affirm the district court’s sentence.
Washington’s sentence is within the guideline range and therefore
presumptively reasonable. See United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th
Cir. 2005). His failure to respond leaves that presumption unrebutted. The district
court’s sentence does not appear to be unreasonable and therefore is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.